A few years ago I began to search the scriptures to determine if l had eternal life. The denomination l was a member of did not seem to offer answers to help give me the assurance I sought. I began to study the Bible and to inquire at work of various ones who seemed to be religious. Among those were several religions that were Pentecostal in their teachings.
Other Gospels
It seemed that everyone I talked to provided a different message of salvation. One would say, “There is only one person in the Godhead.” Another would say, “There are three persons in the Godhead.” Still another would say that one would have to “speak in tongues” to be saved. Another would say you must be immersed and then speak in tongues to be saved. I was confused! Why could I not find from the Bible how to be saved and there be just one single message to respond to?
The Simple Gospel Message
Paul said that he determined to know nothing but Christ and Him crucified, I Corinthians 2:2. Then he would present the good news of His resurrection, Acts 17:30-32. Some wanted to become Christians after hearing the gospel Acts 2:36-37; others hearing the same message wanted to kill those proclaiming it, Acts 5:29-33.
Obeying the Gospel
Those who believed the message of the crucified and risen Savior expressed their faith by repenting and being immersed for forgiveness of their sins, Acts 2:38. They understood they were dead in sin, Romans 6:23 and that Christ paid the price for their sin, Romans 5:8. They desired to express their faith in the death, burial, and resurrection, Romans 6:3-4, so that they could be forgiven of sin, Acts 22:16.
Other Gospels and Another Jesus
Paul said that other gospels and other Jesus’ would be taught, II Corinthians 11:4 and that the message shared would seem genuine II Corinthians 11:13-15. John told us to examine every teaching before accepting them because many false doctrines would be taught I John 4:1. It is comforting that one has a book, the Bible, which can correct any error taught and believed, II Timothy 3:16.
Authority
Below are listed two avenues one may take when responding to God. Which of the following sources should be used when searching for truth’?
| Objective Approach | Subjective Approach | |||||
| Facts | Feelings | |||||
| Revelation | Philosophy | |||||
| Scripture | Experience | |||||
| History | Speculation | |||||
| Assurance | Doubt | |||||
When one responds to truth he must always build his case on the objective approach. Proverbs 28:26 and Jeremiah 17:9. Jacob felt that his son Joseph was dead Genesis 37:18-36 but he was not.
I am thankful that a Christian pointed out to me that it is important not to depend on feelings but to have the assurance from God’s word I John 5:13. As I read about the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch, it was made so clear how he responded to what Jesus had done for him by asking if he could become a Christian, Acts 8:26-39. There was no outburst of emotional feelings by claiming to speak in “foreign languages or ecstatic utterances” but instead the simple understanding that he was lost and he wanted his sins washed away, verse 36. See Acts 22:16.
The Nature of God
Let us examine what the scriptures teach concerning the God of heaven. The Bible teaches our God is one Jehovah, Deuteronomy 6:4, and further states, “… beside me there is no God” Isaiah 44:6. One God, I Timothy 2:5 and God is the only one to be worshipped, Matthew 4:10.
This is one area where all the Pentecostal groups I talked to were united; but then one group would say there is only one person in the Godhead and another said there were three. I learned that the Bible would reveal the truth on this subject.
One or Three Persons in the Godhead
The term “Godhead” itself should indicate to the reader more than one personality. A study of the inspired word reveals that God cannot be compared to anything known to man, Isaiah 40:18, Isaiah 40:25; Colossians 2:9; Acts 17:29. Do the scriptures show Jesus to be a separate person in the Godhead? Note the following: “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God” John 1:1. See Genesis 1:26 “us”. The English definition of the word with is (1) in opposition to (2) alongside of or in the company of (3) associate or companion. (Webster’s New World Dictionary, 1964 Edition). This one scripture shows without any doubt two personalities. See John 16:32. The word ‘both’ in II John 1:9 certainly confirms two – there is no other definition given for this word. The word sent demands a sender and one sent John 5:23-30. Jesus said, “I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.”
When Jesus spoke of His Father he said, “If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him” John 14:23. The pronoun ‘we’ or our can only refer to two or more persons. God gave his Son. A son is a male child in relation to his parents or parent. This relationship is further emphasized in I Corinthians 11:3 “… the head of Christ is God.”
Jesus now reigns at the right side of the Father, Hebrews 1:3 and promises to turn the kingdom over to the Father at the end of time. Then Christ will also be subject to the Father along with all of the hosts of heaven, I Corinthians 15:23-28.
In order for a fact to be established as fact, there must be two witnesses. Jesus said, “I am not alone… the witness to this fact is the Father” John 8:16-18. This scripture concerning Jesus being a witness to the Father’s existence and the Father being a witness to His was a verse which completely frustrated the Pentecostal man I was talking to.
I asked this same man if in the human realm one produced two wills, two witnesses, two minds and two speaking to one another, would He accept two personalities? He answered in the affirmative. These same attributes are found in deity. Matthew 26:39 expresses two wills; John 5:31-37 expresses two witnesses. The Bible teaches that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit all have a mind Romans 11:34; Philippians 2:5 and Romans 8:27. The Holy Spirit intercedes, speaking to the Father, on behalf of Christians clarifying the fact he has a mind. A question I asked was, “If the Holy Spirit is the Father, is He all-knowing?” He answered, “Yes.” I then pointed out that I had a problem scripture that I wanted him to explain. I read: “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide you in all truth; for he will not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall speak and he will show you things to come” John 16:13. I asked, “If the Holy Spirit is God the Father, what does God the Father have to hear (since he is all knowing) and who is he going to hear it from?” Obviously he could offer no explanation.
Baptizing in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit
Is it proper to baptize in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit since it is only mentioned one time by Jesus? There are numerous things only mentioned one time; calling a man father in a religious sense and not forsaking the assembly are two examples. Jesus said that all authority had given his (by whom I wonder?) and then instructed the disciples to teach and immerse those taught by the authority of the Godhead, Matthew 28:18-19. Since Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to the apostles with the will of the Father, John 16:15-16, so it is by authority of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit that he commissioned the disciples to immerse the lost.
In the Name of Jesus Only
If indeed someone would have to say, “In the name of the Lord,” before immersing a person, then he would have to say, “In the name of the Lord,” whenever he did anything, Colossians 3:17. That would mean if a person took food to the needy, the one taking the food would have to “call over” the recipient the words “in the name of the Lord.” There is only one example of a calling over in the book of Acts and that resulted in a disaster for the one doing so, Acts 19:13-17.
Whenever I immerse a person into Christ, I always inform them I am immersing them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit for the forgiveness of their sins as a means of emphasizing what I have taught in the study prior to their response-not as a ‘saving’ formula.
Work of the Holy Spirit Today
One of the most confusing things to me is how almost every Pentecostal group says the Holy Spirit is working in all “spirit filled churches” today. For example, I asked a member of the Assembly of God if the Holy Spirit would endorse anything not approved by God. He said he would not. I then asked, “Do we have the right to disobey the teachings of God when they are endorsed by the Holy Spirit? He said, “No.” I asked if the Holy Spirit is operating in the Catholic church today to which he responded, “Yes.” I said, “Since the Holy Spirit is now giving his endorsement to Catholic doctrine would it not grieve the Holy Spirit if we refused to pray through the Virgin Mary? Since we now know He endorses this teaching by the “signs and wonders” credited to Him by charismatic Catholics and other supporting denominations, should we not keep all teachings of the Roman Catholic church?”
For the first time he was groping for an answer, even petitioning the Holy Spirit for help – yet he realized his helpless condition. How sad it is to see fulfillment of Matthew 7:21-23 – claiming many miraculous events and hearing Jesus say, “I never knew you.”
The Holy Spirit and Conversion
When I asked a member of the Assembly of God the question, “At what point is a person saved from sin?” his reply was similar to what his manual taught, “Sanctification is instantaneous for the moment a person believes in Christ he is separated from sin . .. Some have received the baptism of the Holy Spirit before they were baptized in water.” Our Faith and Fellowship, 1963, pp. 24, 30. When I asked a United Pentecostal the same question he replied as his manual confirms, “The Bible standard of full salvation which is repentance, baptism in water in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and the baptism of the Holy Spirit with the initial sign of speaking in with other tongues as the Spirit gives utterance.” The sequence of events leading to salvation as expressed by these two groups are contradictory to one another. Thus one must be false or both could be, but they both could not be true.
l. Assembly of God: Faith, Repentance, Holy Spirit Baptism, Speak in Tongues, Salvation, Water Baptism.
2. United Pentecostal: Faith, Repentance, Water Baptism, Holy Spirit Baptism, Speak in Tongues, Full Salvation.
3. Bible Acts 2:38-41: Faith, Repentance, Confess Christ, Acts 8:37, Baptism-Forgiven of Sins (Salvation), Receive the Gift of the Holy Spirit.
Faith Only Pentecostals Have a Problem
Since the Assembly of God teaches that salvation precedes water immersion, Jesus’ statement in Mark 16:16 “He that believeth and is immersed shall be saved …” exposes this as a man-made doctrine. Often when I have shared the gospel of Christ a person has such love for the Savior that they will admit their error and are immersed for remission of sins (Acts 2:38). Others because their faith is built on feelings refuse to obey the gospel and forfeit eternal life. See II Thessalonians 1:7-9. They often say, “I know I’m saved, I feel it right here and no matter what that book (pointing to the Bible) says I know I’ll make it to heaven.”
Speaking in Tongues Salvationists Have a Problem
The United Pentecostals teach that full salvation comes after one believes and is immersed and speaks in tongues (evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit). It is believed by this group that this is the point when one receives the seal of sonship. U.P. Manual, p. 24. Then they quote Acts10:44-46 to support their premise without investigating this passage to see if these Gentiles had been immersed in water. See verses 47, 48.
The United Pentecostal manual states that one must be immersed in water before one is saved and yet their members often quote Acts 10:44-46 to confirm the need to speak in tongues.
A question that perplexes all United Pentecostals is, “Did Cornelius receive the seal of sonship immediately when he spoke in tongues?” If their response is ‘Yes’, then a person is a son before immersion, which they deny. If, on the other hand, they answer ‘No’ then we learn speaking in tongues may be performed by the unsaved. Numbers 22:28-29. And that miracle has nothing to do with salvation.
Can the Deaf Go To Heaven?
If it is true a person must be immersed and speak in tongues to have assurance of salvation, then the deaf mute cannot go to heaven. Also a deaf mute could not immerse one into Christ because he could not “call over” the person their saying is necessary for salvation.
Since sign language is a universal language and would not be considered an ‘unknown’ language to other deaf people present, it would not suffice to say this is their means of speaking in tongues.
Since the miraculous age has ended, I Corinthians 13:8-10, with the death of the apostles there is no need for additions to God’s Word beyond the book of Revelation. Phillip performed miracles but could not pass this on, so the apostles went to Samaria so others could receive gifts, Acts 8:14-17. If “tongues” are still prevalent in the church so is “knowledge” and yet I know of no one who would dare add their “inspired knowledge” to God’s word and sell it as part of the Bible.
I have yet to see one claiming miraculous gifts go to a leper colony or morgue and demonstrate with power what they teach is confirmed by their miracles, Hebrews 2:3-4, Mark 16:17-20.
The Truth Shall Make You Free
Jesus made this statement in John 8 which will help any lost person realize that God’s word alone will lead a person to salvation, I Peter1:22-23. The gospel is the power unto salvation, Romans 1:16. When one is immersed he is added to the Lord’s church, Acts 2:47. Why not just be a Christian? This is God’s plea, I Peter 4:16. Contact the church of Christ in your area.
By Bob Danklefsen
T-16, 3/22/90












