About Dean

Just a guy trying to help people see the light of salvation through Jesus Christ.

If We Believe All the Same Things, Why Do Our Churches Seem So Different?

I read an interesting article from another website entitled, “The Gospel Coalition.” Excerpts from an article are included below. The article asks a poignant question. What is the difference between a solid Bible-believing church and one that appears to be one but something just doesn’t feel right?

The author goes on to list the top 10 things he believes distinguishes a Bible-believing church from one that isn’t necessarily so. They are:

1. The mission of the church has gotten sidetracked. What is the mission of the church and is it clearly spelled out?…

2. The church has become over-accommodating…

3. The gospel is assumed. While the right theology may be affirmed in theory, it rarely gets articulated. No one believes the wrong things, but they don’t believe much of anything….

4. There is no careful doctrinal delineation. Theology is not seen as the church’s outboard motor. It’s a nasty barnacle on the hull….

5. The ministry of the word is diminished. While preaching may still be honored in theory, in many churches there is little confidence that paltry preaching is what ails the church and even less confidence that dynamic preaching is the proper prescription…

6. People are not called to repentance. It sounds so simple, and yet it is so easily forgotten.

7. There is no example of carefully handling specific texts of Scripture. People will not trust the Bible as they should unless they see it regularly taught with detail and clarity…

8. There is no functioning ecclesiology. Careful shepherding, elder training, regenerate church membership, a functioning diaconate, purposeful congregational meetings–these are the things you may not know you’ve never had. But when you do, it’s a different kind of church…

9. There is an almost complete disregard for church discipline. If discipline is truly one of the three marks of the church, then many evangelical congregations are not true churches…

10. The real problem is something other than sin and the real remedy is something other than a Savior. The best churches stay focused on the basics…

I think I would have put the last one at the top of the list but all of these are important and there’s no reason to quibble over the order of the list. But to answer the question asked in the title I would submit not all churches believe the gospel or in the certainty of doctrine or many of the things delineated here. Many reject the inerrancy of scripture. They talk a good talk but when forced into a corner they will drop many of the essential points of Christianity so as  not to offend anyone or drive off their audience.

There is much more in the article for each of these points and I highly recommend you follow the link and read the entire article. These are very short excerpts and the article brings out additional points for thought. Please click HERE to read the entire article.

 

Phil Robertson, Duck Commander; Arise, kill and eat

Christian News, May 16, 2012

Links to some articles found on the web about and for Christians.

(Disclaimer, I do not necessarily agree or disagree with any position taken in the linked articles.)

The question of a Christian’s participation in Babylon’s governance is simply not in view in Romans 13. I’ve got to cut this short, so for the sake of space let me just say that in all the accounts of Jesus’ cleansing of the temple (Mark 11:15-19; …
http://facultyblog.eternitybiblecollege.com/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 05:00:53 -0700
I never was raised explicitly Christian- I did go to a Methodist preschool, but I didn’t retain a thing save for the fact that there was apparently a God and Jesus, which I never questioned- it was just a thing that was true and mentioned very rarely, …
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 04:51:20 -0700
Willard teaches that the “yoke” spoken of by Jesus in this passage is to attempt to emulate the life of Christ in every way possible. Willard teaches that this emulation occurs through the practice of the disciplines.7 (For a comprehensive …
http://christianresearchnetwork.com/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 04:42:24 -0700

Here is where we have to get to become Christian when it comes to politics: When one stands before Jesus on the cross, the kingdom is unveiled in its entire splendor and our modern understanding of social engagement is turned on its head.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 03:18:42 -0700
J.D. Greer, Gospel: Recovering the Power that Made Christianity Revolutionary. I have never been comfortable with making a sharp contrast between head knowledge of Jesus and heart knowledge of Jesus. The Bible makes it clear that true …
http://rescuejesusnow.wordpress.com/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 02:38:48 -0700
When I co-wrote Besides the Bible, a collection of essays about books my co-authors and I think every Christian should read, our hopes for the project were modest. We wanted to encourage followers of Jesus to talk about books, especially …
http://thinkchristian.net/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 02:19:40 -0700

“Once more Jesus said to them, ‘I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.’” – John 8:21 (NIV) A popular bumper sticker in some cities calls for us to “coexist.” The letters are made up of the symbols of various faiths, such as an Islamic crescent moon making up the “C,” a Star of David as the “X,” and a Christian cross at the “T.” It reflects an attitude that no matter what you believe, no matter what your faith is, you will go to heaven …
http://disciplebeacon.blogspot.com/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 01:16:00 -0700
People need to experience the Christian life, before they actually sign up. If you think about it, that’s pretty much what happened with Jesus’ disciples. Let me remind you of the three stories I encouraged you to read in the introduction, Mark …
http://philmgreen.wordpress.com/ — Wed, 16 May 2012 01:00:08 -0700
As a result, it is my firm conviction that there is too much autocracy in the leaders of the Christian community, in defiance of the teaching of Jesus and his apostles, and not enough love and gentleness. Too many behave as if they believed not …
http://omflit.wordpress.com/ — Tue, 15 May 2012 23:59:11 -0700

Consternation over Ben Carson, evolution, and morality

An excerpt from an article by Richard Weikart of World Community.  (click on the website link to read the entire article.)

Almost 500 Emory University faculty and students have expressed their dismay that their commencement speaker this morning does not toe the ideological line when it comes to evolutionary biology. Yes, gasp, the renowned Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson does not believe in evolutionary theory. Not only that, the biology professors at Emory and their supporters accuse him of committing a thought crime because he allegedly “equates acceptance of evolution with a lack of ethics and morality.”

Since I am a historian who has studied and published on the history of evolutionary ethics, I was rather surprised by the Emory faculty’s consternation. Last summer I attended a major interdisciplinary conference at Oxford University on “The Evolution of Morality and the Morality of Evolution.” Thus I am well aware that there are a variety of viewpoints in academe on this topic. Nonetheless, many evolutionists—from Darwin to the present (including quite a few at that Oxford conference)—have argued and are still arguing precisely the point that Carson was highlighting: They claim that morality has evolved and thus has no objective existence.

As the article goes on to point out, embracing the theory of evolution removes any ethical standards to preserve social unity. There is no right and no wrong. There is only one group of animals foisting their cultural norms of morality on the rest of society. Or as stated by Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, “Ethics as we understand it is an illusion fobbed off on us by our genes to get us to co-operate.”

The theory of evolution claims survival of the fittest. If evolution is true as proclaimed by the educational elite, morality has no basis in a transcendent Being and all attempts to institute social norms are simply survival of the fittest; one group being the strong setting social norms for everyone else. What’s to prevent an upstart from claiming their social norms should now be the social norm and dominant cultural influence and changing them to suit their desires? In fact, they should be expected to and encouraged to do so. This would lead to constant political, moral and social upheaval in society. The weak are to be used, abused and discarded. Only the strong survive. This is not a society I would wish to be a part of.

 

Shutting Down Christianity

Liberal disdain for all things Christian, and the desire to remove all vestiges of Christianity from public view so as to pack the Christian faith into the four walls of the church, and no place else, is nothing new. The American Civil Liberties Union has been one of those organizations at the forefront of limiting biblical exposure to the general public. Click on the links below to view two different articles on this subject.

 

Shutting Down Christianity One Commandment at a Time.

Judge Suggests Chopping 10 Commandments Down to 6.

Christian News, May 14, 2012

Today’s theme is Jesus, our Savior!

May 14, 2012 | 1:02:47. Every story represents a view of the world. Pastor Tim Chaddick teaches from Matthew 1:1 which begins explaining how Jesus is the ultimate fulfillment to this world’s story.
http://realityla.com/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 16:25:48 -0700
“Joyful” Mondays take us to Mary and the infant Jesus. As Mary undoubtedly treasured her newborn baby, let us resolve to treasure Jesus in our heart. May that excitement, that wonder, that ecstatic joy of Mary always be with us as we live our …
http://www.realmenpraytherosary.org/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 15:11:52 -0700

Alleluia! Sing To Jesus! based on Revelation 5:9-14; text: William Dix (1837-1898); music “Hyfrydol” by Rowland Prichard (1811-1887). after some commentary, the hymn begins at 0:55. I like this example because, besides the pretty english …
http://saintmariagorettichoir.blogspot.com/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:00 -0700
Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics tells a story of decline, in which a host of self-comforting and banal Christianities triumph over the strange, challenging, and paradoxical Jesus of the Gospels. At the start of Douthat’s book …
http://davidaslindsay.blogspot.com/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 12:37:00 -0700
Anyone who has ever been in church is familiar with the hymn, “What a Friend We Have in Jesus.” It was written by a son to comfort his mother whom he had left behind in Ireland when he came to the United States in the 1850s. According to …
http://afreshperspective-chuck.blogspot.com/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 12:34:00 -0700

Then one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, praising God with a loud voice; and he fell on his face at Jesus’ feet, giving him thanks. Now he was a Samaritan. (Luke 17:15-16). The man fell down at Jesus’ feet; he did not …
http://apprising.org/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 10:31:20 -0700
Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not labor for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of …
http://newcreationperson.wordpress.com/ — Mon, 14 May 2012 09:57:23 -0700

Does God “Look on Wickedness”?

by Eric Lyons, M.Min of Apologetics Press

The prophet Habakkuk once spoke to God, saying, “You are of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on wickedness” (1:13). Some have questioned how this statement could be true, considering God allowed the diabolical devil to come before His presence on the “day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord” (Job 1:6). How can God be described accurately as having “purer eyes than to behold evil,” when Satan, “the evil one” (Matthew 6:13), was able to present himself before the Lord and have a conversation with Him? If God can be in the presence of “the wicked one” (1 John 3:12), how can He simultaneously not be able to “look on wickedness”?

Consider, first of all, the fact that the Bible repeatedly testifies to God’s omniscience and omnipresence. “[T]here is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account” (Hebrews 4:13). Neither the righteous nor the wicked can flee from God’s presence (cf. Psalm 139:7-8). He fills heaven and Earth (Jeremiah 23:23-24). Indeed, God is the all-knowing, ever-present One. Thus, given the Bible’s overall teaching about the nature of God, it should be obvious that Habakkuk 1:13 means something other than “God does not know or see what the wicked are doing.”

Second, that Habakkuk meant something other than “God cannot literally look upon wickedness” is also evident from the very chapter and verse in which he makes this statement. After declaring, “You are of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on wickedness” (1:13a), he asked, “Why do You look on those who deal treacherously, and hold Your tongue when the wicked devours a person more righteous than he?” (1:13b, emp. added). Those who “deal treacherously” certainly are engaged in wickedness, and yet, God looks on them. Consider also verse two where the prophet asked, “[H]ow long shall I cry, and You will not hear?” (emp. added). What did he mean by “hear”? He explained in his next statement: “Even cry out to You, ‘Violence!’ and You will not save” (emp. added). Thus, to “hear” in verse two meant “to save.” Similarly, in verse 13 the prophet was not suggesting that God cannot see the wicked. He does, in fact, see them and often even allows them to continue in their existence for a time in order to fulfill His purposes.

In context, Habakkuk was bewildered by the fact that God was using a wicked nation like Babylon to punish Judah. The prophet was undoubtedly aware of Judah’s perverse ways (1:1-4), but did not understand why God would “look” toward the extremely wicked nation of Babylon in order to punish the Jews. The truth is, however, God neither approved of nor ignored Babylon’s sins. After He providentially used them to punish the Jews, He likewise brought judgment upon the Babylonians. Just as He predicted (Jeremiah 50-51; Isaiah 21; 45:1; etc.), Babylon was soon destroyed in the sixth century B.C.

God’s perfectly holy, just, divine nature will not allow Him to “look on wickedness”—meaning, He cannot delight, accept, or ignore iniquity. He hates sin (Proverbs 6:16-19). He “is against those who do evil” (1 Peter 3:12). He may have allowed Satan to come into His presence with the sons of God, but God never looks upon wickedness with pleasure and approval.

Be careful, however, not to confuse God’s refusal to approve sin, with the idea that He does not use sinners—or even Satan—to accomplish His will. He used the extremely wicked Chaldeans to bring judgment upon the Jews. He used the Medes and Persians to destroy the Babylonians. And He even used Satan to prove that His servant Job was faithful, and ultimately to show Himself as the sovereign Ruler of the Universe, Who warrants man’s unwavering respect and loyalty.

Christian News, May 11, 2012

Been a few days. It’s about time!

Mention that Christianity is the only existing worldview with a satisfying answer to the mystery of why we suffer. Both methods result in all present diving under bushes and shaking in horrible conniptions, strangely tempted to put on a ring of …
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/badcatholic/ — Fri, 11 May 2012 11:04:57 -0700
“Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just …
http://foxvalleylabornews.com/ — Fri, 11 May 2012 10:44:35 -0700

Voice of the Martyrs Canada reports Hmong believers in Vietnam are facing opposition from village authorities because of their recent adoption of Christianity. Three families were expelled from their village in Cao Bang province, in northern …
http://www.persecution.org/ — Fri, 11 May 2012 08:42:33 -0700

If you remove relationships with other disciples from a person’s life, you end up with a person who says they are a Christian, but there is no evidence.
http://www.supernaturalhousechurch.org/blog/ — Fri, 11 May 2012 08:19:35 -0700
Relevancy22: Emergent Christianity – Emergent Christian Topics, Issues and Biblical Studies. An Emergent Christian web journal for contemporary doctrinal expression and theology with web links to authors, speakers, institutions, and …
http://relevancy22.blogspot.com/ — Fri, 11 May 2012 08:01:00 -0700

The Skeptic Says: Part Six

This is a series of posts answering a skeptic who rejects Christianity (or any other religion/god) and clings to atheism and natural causes for everything in the universe. Here is the link to the last post – Part Five.

In this post I want to point out the utter emptiness of the atheist’s position IN HIS OWN WORDS. His words show there is no hope, no God and no reason for fulfillment and happiness. There is no joy in atheism. If we are all made up of a bunch of molecules that got together to make this blob of living material, then there is no reason to exist other than to fulfill your every desire. Once that has run its course, nothing else gives meaning to existence. There is no transcendent reason for living, no right, no wrong. No anything other than meaningless existence. The skeptic says:

The other week, I encountered a throng of protesters marching right up my route home. They had banners, flags, cardboard signs, megaphones, and every possible piece of propaganda imaginable. There was not a single left-wing issue that was not mentioned, somewhere. Down with capitalism, it’s time for revolution, stop the regime…

And I thought to myself: I’ll bet they feel great, having some transcendent cause to get together and chant about; their loins girded up by the absolute certainty of their rightness.

I don’t think I’m ever going to feel that again.

Speaking of his fellow atheists he writes:

Nearly every one of you believes you are intelligent, but this is emphatically not the case. You all believe you are upstanding and empathetic human beings, but this is also not the case. A great many of you are hateful, superficial in your thoughts about key issues, selfish and prejudiced.

You were a reason to keep the faith.

And here in this quote on why he left Christianity:

I happened to find myself in a particular set of life circumstances that allowed a complete and uninterrupted inquiry into the givens of existence, and it has resulted in my effectively disowning the Christian faith that started all this off. The operative question for me had always been: if Christianity is not true in some way, shape or form, then what is? What can replace it? And my search of the alternatives has left me with nothing. It is obvious to me that people who happily leave Christianity for Atheism, and describe a sense of freedom, have never really thought about Christianity when they were Christians, and never really thought about Atheism before embracing it. I would dare say that they never really thought about anything at all.

That’s just my view. I challenge the optimistic philosophers, and the distracted and well-fed secular humanists, to explain the existence of the pessimists and the failing struggle with nihilism. For all the ridicule heaped on religious believers for wishful thinking, the irony is piled sky-high by the lazy and optimistic philosophies of the atheists who do the ridiculing. Do they really think such people who have thought extensively upon such things wish to be terrified and made so miserable by their own views? Or does their logic and reason not show them the obvious–that they have every motivation in the world to delude themselves, and that they have successfully done so?

And here, describing Christian music:

I dug up some of the old worship songs / Christian music that I used to listen to.

Some of it was almost too much to take–hearing it again.

And some of it even got me dancing around and mouthing the words (combined with a complicated feeling that I’m not sure I know how to describe). And I felt like I believed every word I was mouthing. There’s nothing to replace it.

The emptiness of atheism on display. And logically, his thoughts are correct. If there is no God, nothing is worth living for.

The Real Integrity Test

From Church and Culture.

If you lie, commit adultery, take drugs, break the speed limit, drink and drive, and willingly handle stolen goods, you’re in good company.

Or at least company.

According to research from Essex University in England, British people have become markedly less honest in the last decade.  Coupled with this decline in morality is a growing acceptance of dishonest behavior.

For example, in 2000 70% said that an extramarital affair was never justified.  Now, barely 50% would agree.  Only 33% feel lying on a job application was wrong.

I am confident the same survey would reveal similar results in the United States.

Here is the test:

Rate your attitude to each of the following activities with one point if you think it is never justified; two points if you think it is rarely justified; three if you view it as sometimes justified and four if you think it is always justified.

Be honest.

A. Avoiding paying the fare on public transport.

B. Cheating on taxes if you have a chance.

C. Driving faster than the speed limit.

D. Keeping money you found in the street.

E. Lying in your own interests.

F. Not reporting accidental damage you have done to a parked car.

G. Throwing away litter in a public place.

H. Driving under the influence of alcohol.

I. Making up a job application.

J. Buying something you know is stolen.

According to the authors, a score below 10 suggests you are very honest, 11 to 15 means you do not mind bending the rules but are more honest than average, 16 to 20 suggests you are relaxed about the rules and anything more than 21 suggests you do not believe in living by the rules.

I’ll let you judge your own score.

I’ll confess I scored in the 11-15 range.  (My answer on “speeding” took a toll.)

What I found interesting was not simply the decline in morality, or its growing acceptance, but the nature of that acceptance.  Did you notice what the questions had in common?

They each posed the opportunity to do something when no one was looking.

It is often said that true integrity is who you are when no one is looking.  If the lack of integrity is similarly scored, then “Oh, my.”  Suddenly, this test is even more revealing than imagined.

It’s not that we would do more things that lack integrity, or are more accepting of them in ourselves and others, but that the opportunity to “get away” with it is one of the great driving forces of whether we would do it.  It’s not only an absence of an internal compass, but no sense of any transcendent accountability.

One of the great biblical models of integrity, Joseph, faced a sexual temptation of this nature.  He was approached for a sexual tryst with a woman that would be private, discrete, and enormously enjoyable (Potiphar’s position ensured that he could have almost any woman of his choosing, so there is little doubt she would have been highly attractive).

Joseph’s response?

“How then could I do such a wicked thing and sin against God?”

Who talks that way anymore?  Who believes that way anymore?

This is the heart of the moral decline, and the deeper spiritual story behind the cultural polling.  It’s not that we don’t know right from wrong.  According to the Bible, that’s written in our hearts.

No, it’s that we’ve lost any sense of constantly living our life before an audience

… of One.

James Emery White

Sources

John Binghan, “Rise in dishonesty signals looming ‘integrity crisis’ in Britain,” The Telegraph, January 25, 2012. Read online.